Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is better than Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. The LG Wing construction is newer, but much heavier and thicker than the Motorola One Zoom. LG Wing has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Wing counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px. LG Wing features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Wing also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
LG Wing has a very superior memory for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG Wing's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Motorola One Zoom.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Zoom, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.