Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo, getting an 80 score against 78.8. Motorola One Zoom is an older and notably thicker cellphone than the Microsoft Surface Duo, but Motorola made it lighter anyway. The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo also has a higher amount of RAM.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better 1800 x 2700 resolution. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom has just a bit better battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola One Zoom is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.