Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with a global score of 85.3 against 80. Even though the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much heavier than Motorola One Zoom, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a much higher 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit superior battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4449mAh battery size.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs more money than Motorola One Zoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.