Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Motorola One Zoom is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Zoom also has a greater number of cores (although slower).
Moto Z Force features a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Zoom features a little longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola One Zoom features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.