Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a general score of 80 against 77.4. Motorola One Zoom is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's much thicker and way heavier. The Moto Z2 Play features a bit faster processor than Motorola One Zoom. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a screen that is just as good as the Motorola One Zoom one, although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, a little smaller screen and a quite lower pixel number per inch in the screen. Motorola One Zoom shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Moto Z2 Play features a better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Zoom has longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.