Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is slightly better than Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Motorola One Zoom's design is newer, but somewhat heavier and way thicker than the Moto Z3. The Moto Z3 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit lower display density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. Motorola One Zoom captures way better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera with much more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture.
Moto Z3 has more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Zoom counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z3, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.