Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 80 score against 79.8. Motorola One Zoom's body has the same thickness than the Motorola One Hyper, but it is just a little bit lighter. The Motorola One Hyper's processor is very similar to the Motorola One Zoom one, they have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Motorola One Hyper features a screen that is very similar to the screen in Motorola One Zoom, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a bit worse pixel count per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Motorola One Zoom shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper and Motorola One Zoom both have incredibly similar batteries performance.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.