Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Motorola One Zoom is a a bit thinner and lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were released only 1 months apart. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a slightly better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a quite bigger display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same aperture and the same resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One Zoom is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.