Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Motorola One Zoom is a noticeably older and a little thicker device than Galaxy A15 5G, but Motorola made it just a little lighter anyway. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a little larger screen. Galaxy A15 5G features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has superior battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a worse 48 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.