Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's global score of 76.2. Motorola One Zoom's construction is just a little bit lighter but somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola One Zoom has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A16 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments. The Galaxy A16 5G features better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A16 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.