Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's 76.1 global score. The Motorola One Zoom construction is a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A21, although it is a little thicker and was released only 10 months before. Motorola One Zoom features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A21 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A21 features a battery performance that's just as good as the battery life in Motorola One Zoom. The Motorola One Zoom shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A21. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A21, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.