Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting an 81.3 score against 80. The Galaxy A31 is a a bit thinner and just a bit lighter phone than the Motorola One Zoom, even when they were released only a couple of months apart. Motorola One Zoom and Samsung Galaxy A31 count with really similar CPUs, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola One Zoom counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same resolution camera and a same size sensor, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture.
Motorola One Zoom counts with just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A31 counts with better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.