Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having a general score of 80 against 79.4. Motorola One Zoom is a way older and just a little thicker phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Motorola could make it a bit lighter anyway. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little larger display. The Motorola One Zoom features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 128 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features greater battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, a lower 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.