Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), with a general score of 80 against 75.8. Motorola One Zoom's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The Motorola One Zoom has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Zoom counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.