Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. The Galaxy A50 body is lighter and thinner than Motorola One Zoom, even when both of them were released only 6 months apart. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a display of the same size, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 and the same quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Zoom and Samsung Galaxy A50 count with extremely similar batteries duration. Motorola One Zoom features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.