Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a 90.8 score against 80. Even though Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola One Zoom were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy A51 5G is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola One Zoom, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same resolution camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G features a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.