Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, with an 87.5 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy A71's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Zoom, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy A71 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 features a screen that's very similar to the Motorola One Zoom one, because although the Galaxy A71 has a little worse pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy A71 has more memory for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A71 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy A71 is also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.