Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 global score. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Motorola One Zoom. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.