Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, with a overall score of 85.2 against 80. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s construction is thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola One Zoom, although it was released around 10 months before. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Zoom and Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) count with really similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Motorola One Zoom features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.