Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the Galaxy C5, with an 80 score against 76.4. Motorola One Zoom's construction is much newer than the Galaxy C5's, although it is incredibly heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy C5 features a screen that is just as good as the display in Motorola One Zoom, because although the Samsung Galaxy C5 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
The Motorola One Zoom has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy C5. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola One Zoom takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot better video quality.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C5, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.