Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having an 80 score against 78.4. The Motorola One Zoom design is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro and Motorola One Zoom both count with quite similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a little smaller screen, a little bit lower pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Motorola One Zoom has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom features better battery lifetime than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 21% more battery size. The Motorola One Zoom features a very superior camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.