Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola One Zoom's general score of 80. Galaxy Fold's construction is thinner but extremely heavier than the Motorola One Zoom, and both were released with only a few months difference. Galaxy Fold has a display that's just as good as the Motorola One Zoom one, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Zoom takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.