Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, with an 80 score against 76.1. Motorola One Zoom's design is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's, but it's just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy J7 Max and Motorola One Zoom both count with really similar displays, although the Galaxy J7 Max has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit lower pixels amount in each display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.