Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a score of 98.9 against 80. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer and a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a quite larger display, a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little longer battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.