Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's 80 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola One Zoom shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much larger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.