Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. The Motorola One Zoom is a incredibly newer phone than Galaxy Note 5, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Galaxy Note 5 has a better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has 7 more cores.
Motorola One Zoom captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture for better low light images, a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality pictures and videos and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Motorola One Zoom features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a bit more expensive than Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Note 5. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy Note 5, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.