Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 80. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an much older phone than the Motorola One Zoom, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola One Zoom takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One Zoom counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.