Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola One Zoom, having an 89 score against 80. Galaxy Note10's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Zoom, although they were released with only 0 months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a just a bit worse pixel count in each inch in the display, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola One Zoom features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Zoom. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.