Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, with an 86.2 score against 80. Although Galaxy Note10 Lite and the Motorola One Zoom were only released with a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Note10 Lite body is just a bit heavier but also a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Zoom.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.