Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom's 80 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note5 is an extremely older phone than the Motorola One Zoom, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater display density.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Zoom. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 128 GB.
The Motorola One Zoom has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.