Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is slightly better than Motorola One Zoom, with a overall score of 83 against 80. Galaxy Note8's design is just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, although it is a little heavier and was released many years before. The Galaxy Note8 has a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy Note8 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has more RAM. Motorola One Zoom features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 128 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Zoom takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Motorola One Zoom has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note8 is also cheap compared to the Motorola One Zoom.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.