Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than the Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. Even when the Galaxy S10 and Motorola One Zoom were only released 6 months apart, the Galaxy S10 is lighter and thinner. Galaxy S10 counts with a sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola One Zoom features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Zoom has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.