Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Motorola One Zoom, with a general score of 93.6 against 80. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction is somewhat thinner but a little heavier than the Motorola One Zoom, and both of them were only released 4 months apart. Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a just a bit higher display density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.