Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a global score of 86.3 against 80. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is much lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, although they were released only 6 months apart. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola One Zoom shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy S10e features more memory for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola One Zoom features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.