Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a general score of 94.8 against 80. The Galaxy S20 construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola One Zoom, even when both of them were released with only 6 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 has a battery duration that's just as good as the battery performance in Motorola One Zoom. The Motorola One Zoom shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video and faster 30 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy S20 costs a lot more than Motorola One Zoom, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.