Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 body is extremely lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy S25 has an incredibly better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
Motorola One Zoom has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One Zoom and the Samsung Galaxy S25 both count with incredibly similar battery durations. Galaxy S25 has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.