Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Zoom, with a global score of 90.7 against 80. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola One Zoom. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.