Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 80 score against 77.8. Motorola One Zoom is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per screen inch. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43% more battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a way bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a much more MP back facing camera.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S5 Sport. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.