Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-09-05 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a overall score of 80.9 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a quite better performance than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a much better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola One Zoom features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.