Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the Galaxy S7, with a score of 80 against 79.5. Motorola One Zoom is a noticeably newer cellphone than Galaxy S7, but it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger sensor.
The Motorola One Zoom has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Zoom features greater battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy S7, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.