Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having an 80 score against 75.8. Motorola One Zoom's design is much newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 72 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Zoom features just a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Zoom also has a greater number of cores.
The Motorola One Zoom shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels. Galaxy S7 Active's battery life is just as good as Motorola One Zoom's battery duration.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.