Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's overall score of 80. The Galaxy S9 design is lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, although it was released just a little more than a year before. Galaxy S9 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Zoom features a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and videos in low-light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola One Zoom features longer battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S9 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.