Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 5, with a global score of 80 against 78.1. Motorola One Zoom is an older and a little heavier phone than the Galaxy XCover 5, but Motorola was able to make it just a little thinner anyway. Galaxy XCover 5's processor is just as good as the processor in Motorola One Zoom, they have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a higher display density, a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger display. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola One Zoom has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.