Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with an 80 score against 77.6. Despite of the fact that Motorola One Zoom is much older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is lighter and thinner. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Zoom has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each display inch. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola One Zoom captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.