Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom's 80 general score. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than the Motorola One Zoom, we must note that it's also a heavier and thicker phone. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a little better pixel number in each inch in the screen. The Motorola One Zoom features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Zoom features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a much higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.