Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Motorola One Zoom, having an 88.5 score against 80. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, even when they were released with only 5 months difference. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Zoom features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% greater battery size. Motorola One Zoom has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Zoom, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.