Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, having a global score of 85.6 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola One Zoom. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little larger display and a little bit higher display pixels density.
The Motorola One Zoom features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 128 GB. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot more MP camera in the back. The Motorola One Zoom has better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.