Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Motorola One Zoom's overall score of 80. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and thinner than Motorola One Zoom. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a little bit larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a quite better pixel number per inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola One Zoom has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more than Motorola One Zoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.