Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a 94.6 score against 80. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and thinner than Motorola One Zoom's, although it is also notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a larger screen. Motorola One Zoom shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more storage for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola One Zoom, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.