Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 general score. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than Motorola One Zoom, it's extremely thinner and newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a display that's very similar to Motorola One Zoom's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208px resolution and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.